As I'm sure is true for most of us, I have felt conflicted about zoos since
I was a child. I see them now, in light of my studies at UWSP (especially with
my Captive Wildlife minor), as an important piece in the fight for widespread
and successful conservation.
I never saw zoos as simply family entertainment, like going to the movies.
I saw them more as a mini pilgrimage for each visitor, like gravitating toward
your favorite part of a museum, studying the dioramas and reading every plaque,
and trying to understand something greater than yourself. I saw that the
species I admired most came from every continent, every habitat type, and lived
next to every kind of people. It made the world seem smaller. Improving it
seemed within reach, and I wanted to be a part of that. Everyone's journey
toward doing something for the environment is different, and not everyone who
cares makes it their career, but I am saying that the way zoos inspire people
is unique and can definitely be used.
As an institution, zoos are a bit like hunting. Animals make small
sacrifices on the whole, people feel some benefit, and at the end of the day, a
percentage of the people feel motivated to take some environmentally positive
action that will benefit animals as well. However, hunters support things like
biological studies and habitat preservation more or less automatically when
they are taxed on the equipment they buy, and the benefits are felt more
locally. With the price of admission, zoogoers automatically contribute to
nothing more than the upkeep of the zoo they are visiting. Some people are
happy paying the bills for just one particular giant panda, in exchange for
learning her name. But many would like to do more, and understand more. I think
some of the best improvements in zoo design include an outlet for that desire.
This includes donation boxes where recently impassioned world citizens can
help various projects without having to actually become, say, a WWF scientist,
lawyer, or expert. It includes displays or even videos of what people in the
field of conservation are doing, and this helps foster a sense of connectedness
between the wildlife expert and the concerned layperson. This is one of the
most important pieces in the conservation puzzle, in this Pointer's opinion.
Another outlet is information about exactly what they can do themselves.
Being preached at never works, but when people already know they want to
change, information is all they need to start.
The Milwaukee County Zoo, for one small example, has a display directly
next to the orangutans about deforestation and the palm oil trade in Indonesia.
The intention to buy fewer products made with palm oil is easily internalized
when the motivation for it is playing on fire hose swings right in front of
you. Wait until these same people go home to sleep and work, and then try to
first tell them about palm oil. They won't be in the mood.
That's what zoos are good for. People go because
they already like animals. With the right communication, what they take home
can be much more profound.
2 comments:
I agree with your blog. Zoos are a great place to learn about the animals, it only takes time to realize that. I understand it seems like just a fun day for younger kids, but with the programs zoos have now days, I feel little kids are actually learning something that can help with wildlife restoration in all parts of the world.
Ahh yes, I agree. I'd say that educational programs for kids, and even just regular visits, are a whole other facet of zoos getting animal issues higher on people's lists of things that are imporant to them. Starting from a young age is, I think, very beneficial.
Post a Comment